LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cape Wind opponents plead with council to ‘reject’ wind farm plans for Nantucket Sound 

Credit:  By Sean Walsh | barnstable-hyannis.patch.com | 18 May 2012 ~~

The final three public hearings regarding Cape Wind’s push forward with its offshore wind farm construction plans in Nantucket Sound will be held this week in Natick, Boston and on Wednesday, May 22 at Barnstable High School. The public hearing will begin at 7:00 pm in the Knight Auditorium at 744 West Main St., Hyannis.

Audra Parker, president of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, spoke up against Cape Wind’s plans last night during the public comment section of the Barnstable Town Council Meeting, citing huge jumps in the future cost of electricity to local homeowners, businesses and municipalities and offered that for the Town of Barnstable alone the initial annual increase in utility bills would be “$40,000” but by the “15th year of the contract (between NStar and Cape Wind),” the increase would rise to an estimated “$75,000.”

In total, she estimated that the annual increased cost of power to Massachusetts consumers would be in the vicinity of $1.3 billion, with small businesses like local restaurants seeing their electric bills jump as high as $2,200 per month.

“We can’t afford to pay more,” Parker said.

According to Cape Wind’s web site, Parker’s numbers weren’t much, if at all, different. But what Cape Wind does claim is that its wind farm will provide cleaner energy, more jobs and “increased energy independence.”

“Finally,” the web site reads, “Cape Wind is within sight of the ‘finish line’ but we need our supporters to make their voices heard this one last time at the final set of public hearings to make Massachusetts home to the nation’s first offshore wind farm and get the jobs, increased energy independence, and cleaner air that it will bring.”

Cape Wind concedes that its proposed 25-square miles of 440-foot tall turbines will bring approximately 50 full-time jobs to the region and in its construction face, up to 1,000 short-term jobs. In spite of Parker’s pleas to the town council Thursday night during the council’s public comment section, none of the councillors took the opportunity to voice their opinions on the subject.

West Barnstable resident Mary Loughnane was the sole other person aside from Parker who spoke out against Cape Wind’s plans. None spoke in favor of the plans.

“When you really look at the comparisons,” she said, “it’s frightening.”

Matt Weir, a Woodland Avenue Hyannis resident who lives directly next to the wind turbine located at Country Gardens on West Main Street spoke up about wind turbines in general, citing that the noise keeps him awake every night.

“I hear it day and night,” Weir said and characterized Cape Wind’s plans as a “scam.”

“Cape Wind is a private developer seeking to build an industrial scale offshore wind power plant on Horseshoe Shoal in Nantucket Sound.

Covering 25 square miles, an area the size of Manhattan, the plant would consist of 130 wind turbines, each standing 440′ tall – significantly larger than the Statue of Liberty (305′) and the Cape Cod Canal bridges (275′). The plant would also include a 10-story electrical service platform, holding 40,000 gallons of transformer oil and 1000 gallons of diesel fuel, with a helicopter pad on top,” according to the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound’s web site.

Source:  By Sean Walsh | barnstable-hyannis.patch.com | 18 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky