LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind industry should consider tax credit phase-out, Baucus says 

Credit:  By Kathleen Hunter, Bloomberg, www.bloomberg.com 20 March 2012 ~~

The wind energy industry should think “very seriously” about backing a proposal to phase out a tax credit for building more energy-generating turbines, U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said today.

The Montana Democrat said in an interview that phasing out the tax credit might be the most realistic way to keep it from expiring at the end of the year.

Companies that invest in wind energy include General Electric Co. (GE), based in Fairfield, Connecticut, and Denmark’s Vestas Wind Systems A/S (VWS).

“The industry needs a little boost, but that boost can’t last forever,” said Baucus, the Senate’s chief tax writer. “The more the industry can figure out a way to proceed by cutting back, phasing out, the better it’d probably be.”

Baucus said his office has been talking with industry representatives about backing a phase-out approach.

The production tax credit provides an incentive for installation of wind turbines, based on the number of kilowatt- hours generated. For wind, the credit will cost the government $1.3 billion in fiscal 2012, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Similar credits are available for energy produced from other renewable sources.

Given the tight budget outlook, the idea of phasing out the wind credit rather than extending it has drawn support from Republican senators.

‘Glide Path’

“I’ve talked to the industry about that,” Senator John Thune of South Dakota, a member of the Republican leadership, told reporters today. “If you can demonstrate a glide path to getting where you don’t need the credit any more, phasing it out over time, I think it’s going to be a lot more palatable politically to try to get an approach like that through.”

The industry hasn’t endorsed a phase-out of the credit. Denise Bode, chief executive officer of the American Wind Energy Association, a trade group, said, “A full one-year extension in the first part of this year remains the wind industry’s top priority.” Bode added that the group “is committed to looking at a variety of options for the tax credit in the future.”

Because turbines must be placed in service by the end of 2012 to qualify for the credit, the industry and its advocates in Congress say action is needed soon to prevent investment from drying up.

Expiring in Spring

“As a practical matter, wind is going to expire really in the spring of this year,” Senator Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican who has proposed a two-year extension of the credit, told reporters March 13. “They’re going to shut down all the component manufacturing because you aren’t going to manufacture for inventory if you don’t think they’re going to be used.”

Senator Kent Conrad, a North Dakota Democrat who supports the tax credit, said March 15 in an interview that he would “want to see the specific proposal before reacting to it.”

“We are making great progress at getting wind to be almost viable without help, but we’re not there yet,” Conrad said. “So the devil would be in the details.”

Another Finance Committee member, Senator Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat, said he would prefer to extend the current credit.

“It would be, I think, ill-advised to start talking about a finite policy on wind without knowing how it affects the other sources of energy,” Cardin said today in an interview. “So I’m for a straight extension. I think that gives us the time to try to come up with a rational energy policy.”

Source:  By Kathleen Hunter, Bloomberg, www.bloomberg.com 20 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon