Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Comments on the DEIS for the Deerfield Wind Project
Author: | Aesthetics, Emissions, Environment, Filings, Regulations, Vermont, Wildlife
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement [DEIS] for the Deerfield Wind Project, Federal Register, Volume 73, No. 193, page 57620, October 3, 2008.
As we clearly stated in our August 2005 scoping comment letter, we are very concerned about the impacts of any development on the Lamb Brook area which we believe should be recommended for designation as Wilderness. We do not believe these and other issues first raised in 2005 were adequately addressed in this DEIS.
The DEIS Is Premature
NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act of 1969] Requires Meaningful Public Involvement
Forest Service National Wind Energy Policy Is Not Yet Final
The Public Service Board Process Is On-Going
Proponent vs. Permit Holder Is Unclear
The DEIS Is Flawed
The Purpose and Need Are Too Narrowly Drawn
Weighting the Screening Analysis to the Proponent’s Proposal Was Arbitrary and Capricious
An Inadequate Range of Alternatives Is Proposed
Conditions of the Permit Are Not Disclosed
Bias and Forest Service Responsibilities Are a Concern When Using Proponent-Financed Contracting
Failure to Comply with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and NEPA
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) Concurrence Has Not Been Obtained
Effects under NEPA Have Not Been Disclosed
The Issue of Federal Preemption
Lamb Brook: The Injunction and Future Uses
Only a Court of Law May Lift the Injunction
The DEIS Fails to Address the Injunction
The DEIS Does Not Improve Discussion of Mitigation Measures for Illegal ATVs
Forest Service Fails to Disclose Potential Future Logging in Lamb Brook
The Lamb Brook Roadless Area Was Not Properly Considered in the GMNF [Green Mountain National Forest] Plan
Roadless Inventory on the GMNF Is Flawed
The Forest Service Fails to Take a “Hard Look” as Required Under NEPA
Effects on Bears
The Effect on Bats Has Not Been Adequately Disclosed
Bats Are at Risk
Pre-construction Surveys Can Not Predict Mortality
Deerfield Wind Is Similar to Other Sites with High Mortality
Bigger Turbines Kill More Bats
New Information Regarding Mode of Bat Kill Needs to Be Considered
Impacts to Bats from Wind Energy Are Cumulative
Climate and Air
Displacement of Emissions Is Not Adequately Analyzed
The DEIS Fails to Adequately Consider the Carbon Storage Values Lost in Building a Wind Energy Facility
Visuals
Nighttime Views in Vermont Is Not Addressed
Social and Economic Effects
Power Capability and the Capacity Factor Are Not Accurately Calculated
Mary C. Krueger
Forest Policy Analyst
The Wilderness Society
950 Pearl Hill Road
Fitchburg, MA 01420
(978) 342-2159
mary_krueger@tws.org
Mollie Matteson
Conservation Advocate
Center for Biological Diversity
Northeast Field Office
P.O. Box 188
Richmond, VT 05477
(802) 434-2388
mmatteson@biologicaldiversity.org
Download original document: “Comments on the DEIS for the Deerfield Wind Project”
This material is the work of the author(s) indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this material resides with the author(s). As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Queries e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share:
Tags: Wind power, Wind energy